Currently Building

Design Skills Lab

Repeatable thinking for design work.

Two connected skills: one turns research into traceable evidence; the other turns Figma files into actionable findings.

In development85% · Draft build

Core workflows written. Validation and edge cases in progress. This is a development estimate, not measured accuracy.

01 / Research workflow

Multi-agent UX research

Focused research roles share one evidence ledger. Every conclusion should connect to a source and a product decision.

  1. 01

    Plan

    Frame the brief.

  2. 02

    Explore

    Collect sources.

  3. 03

    Listen

    Find user signals.

  4. 04

    Synthesize

    Connect evidence.

  5. 05

    Report

    Shape decisions.

multi-agent-ux-research/SKILL.md

Download draft

Illustrative output / Format example

A finding should show how it was reached.

This example demonstrates the intended report structure. It is not a result from a completed research run.

Input question
How do technicians resume an interrupted investigation?
Evidence required
A source-linked observation showing what context was lost and how the person recovered it.
Decision supported
Evaluate whether persistent investigation context addresses the observed interruption. Keep assumptions separate until the evidence supports them.

02 / Connected file review

Figma UI audit

Read the file as a system: interface hierarchy, component consistency and accessibility, with precise locations for each finding.

  1. 01

    Read the file

    Locate the selected frame and components.

  2. 02

    Review

    Check interface, system and access.

  3. 03

    Record

    Attach location, evidence and severity.

  4. 04

    Recommend

    Return a specific fix to verify.

figma-ui-audit/SKILL.md

Download draft

Illustrative output / Format example

Specific enough to act on.

A sample of the intended finding format, awaiting validation on connected files.

Location and evidence
Identify the exact field and its visible label. Link the frame or component so the finding can be inspected.
Issue
If a password field repeats “Email ID”, explain how the label conflicts with the expected input.
Recommended fix and check
Use a purpose-specific label. Verify the change across reused instances and relevant states.

Build status

The structure is in place.
Calibration comes next.

The draft contains two downloadable skills, research roles, evidence rules and a finding format. Remaining work: connected-file access, human comparison and incomplete-evidence handling.

  1. 01Affected frame or component
  2. 02Severity and the rule being evaluated
  3. 03Evidence linked to a location or source
  4. 04A recommended fix with a verification step